Information on Result #508278
There is no (64, 102, 131482)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 21 517345 285270 818632 299246 304808 337765 167467 187522 647127 144680 690849 450293 311161 820703 579004 467377 > 9102
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (64, 103, 131482)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |