Information on Result #508315
There is no (20, 104, 451)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1798 887964 893426 167909 424885 705208 883978 104069 342560 740130 633989 316145 040445 283739 001734 671269 954417 > 9104
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (20, 105, 451)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |