Information on Result #508331

There is no (52, 104, 8638)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1745 912486 871169 231238 915633 109760 392783 780082 087825 673563 999974 152263 460972 966842 432859 417742 832545 > 9104

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (52, 105, 8638)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction