Information on Result #508334

There is no (58, 104, 24320)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1743 546666 437826 101333 699429 025304 546170 558501 160385 749360 309101 818525 577495 368818 685077 351881 156609 > 9104

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (58, 105, 24320)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction