Information on Result #508345

There is no (21, 105, 477)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 16792 349693 706031 133691 247259 072789 895356 327559 981994 167876 802117 482904 025621 834710 002318 062986 120145 > 9105

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (21, 106, 477)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction