Information on Result #508366

There is no (63, 105, 64052)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 15686 634027 409153 134711 120088 785887 875028 938481 734016 930205 636072 633654 125105 827009 125770 098273 438497 > 9105

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (63, 106, 64052)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction