Information on Result #508531

There is no (27, 111, 662)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8846 867652 171177 198212 498134 632369 320147 181840 321975 505592 350399 102479 080589 327931 503586 192097 715513 437985 > 9111

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (27, 112, 662)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction