Information on Result #508540

There is no (45, 111, 2647)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8365 172279 311135 521749 212114 999260 762815 849873 505965 553846 952406 010589 596373 631127 892590 041223 924240 808377 > 9111

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (45, 112, 2647)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction