Information on Result #508549

There is no (63, 111, 31729)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8340 052888 457767 012192 878741 612309 253546 372679 456607 020882 025282 283170 458891 671796 023656 274729 063730 852289 > 9111

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (63, 112, 31729)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction