Information on Result #508692
There is no (32, 116, 867)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 510 918902 276925 476294 840019 017515 921639 521218 104267 893686 637423 287780 544630 974660 108297 492596 690404 842853 359985 > 9116
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (32, 117, 867)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |