Information on Result #508857

There is no (31, 121, 784)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 29 900896 238926 644199 299731 107956 993577 029878 662041 000084 700173 171462 191742 269656 419332 092252 140971 753687 635108 760193 > 9121

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (31, 122, 784)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction