Information on Result #508891

There is no (32, 122, 825)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 275 051707 204226 169900 094985 567155 970626 757785 203366 501834 015429 731607 023040 777954 736420 235757 346845 659950 898759 066025 > 9122

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 123, 825)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction