Information on Result #508891
There is no (32, 122, 825)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 275 051707 204226 169900 094985 567155 970626 757785 203366 501834 015429 731607 023040 777954 736420 235757 346845 659950 898759 066025 > 9122
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (32, 123, 825)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction |