Information on Result #508898
There is no (46, 122, 2152)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 265 274557 657489 130624 915182 054080 987863 641291 561354 878697 603804 523391 883126 160714 610966 023317 426503 441714 266715 981441 > 9122
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (46, 123, 2152)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |