Information on Result #508908

There is no (66, 122, 20292)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 261 610634 371933 168920 490392 721750 144339 927657 590807 283457 508883 288624 064203 666748 707843 304111 385622 263664 401785 818241 > 9122

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (66, 123, 20292)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction