Information on Result #508960
There is no (32, 124, 813)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 21958 910261 443990 098005 037823 479601 475234 488913 784818 970358 480259 960611 060927 946532 048317 966401 236297 456878 152589 571825 > 9124
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (32, 125, 813)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |