Information on Result #509071

There is no (45, 127, 1798)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 15 658402 580091 076775 967442 746721 018875 485308 770466 458530 904770 494548 255985 049832 951828 835561 925463 124861 263379 857797 173425 > 9127

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (45, 128, 1798)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction