Information on Result #509095

There is no (22, 128, 488)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 152 360735 685384 270296 480154 970674 728333 698119 835260 287723 972504 244988 280840 551058 664724 660719 128114 606251 336082 297429 332545 > 9128

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (22, 129, 488)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction