Information on Result #509175
There is no (38, 130, 1092)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11651 284611 523793 182531 682427 204096 212131 409663 038907 999761 855275 076026 045985 866083 270511 011765 978385 673614 843583 082150 028609 > 9130
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (38, 131, 1092)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |