Information on Result #509179

There is no (46, 130, 1830)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11452 338433 467512 935254 285944 349211 328177 473399 873148 605969 543616 407502 216985 083889 425309 014759 756729 617297 961163 726877 003297 > 9130

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (46, 131, 1830)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction