Information on Result #509180
There is no (48, 130, 2116)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11425 284372 842755 570816 339670 354130 340453 502284 658313 440073 261403 508538 585848 908898 258298 006273 531694 586410 300919 192196 675873 > 9130
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (48, 131, 2116)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |