Information on Result #509182

There is no (52, 130, 2895)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11323 920345 269212 329898 712629 073455 384305 029032 832751 052736 412471 183452 971473 867010 364131 152663 203807 473395 224027 493037 901385 > 9130

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (52, 131, 2895)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction