Information on Result #509189
There is no (66, 130, 12015)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11282 223547 593443 253766 559197 671790 791462 367129 987429 463974 425678 899187 701888 217033 232842 498433 926360 997515 358767 922867 261185 > 9130
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (66, 131, 12015)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction |