Information on Result #509209

There is no (33, 131, 821)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 106976 176481 665415 720290 394106 109090 942920 644270 661152 186109 148626 176952 731029 018421 027967 056435 380814 302973 406825 008321 930025 > 9131

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (33, 132, 821)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction