Information on Result #509209
There is no (33, 131, 821)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 106976 176481 665415 720290 394106 109090 942920 644270 661152 186109 148626 176952 731029 018421 027967 056435 380814 302973 406825 008321 930025 > 9131
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (33, 132, 821)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction |