Information on Result #509216
There is no (47, 131, 1929)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 101626 906304 051180 688093 090837 993402 280858 870596 383369 699473 940789 072678 053058 796677 840076 679853 782589 609760 652403 438997 150225 > 9131
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (47, 132, 1929)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |