Information on Result #509218
There is no (51, 131, 2605)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 101493 930073 799982 412312 706346 264324 518612 452168 407532 117167 613310 337831 787935 567978 635695 339621 401634 979420 073039 867415 554369 > 9131
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (51, 132, 2605)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |