Information on Result #509246

There is no (34, 132, 860)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 962425 949637 129293 763895 261947 907083 178299 180963 669476 404308 709234 821688 833069 295143 045323 462045 644123 602659 212169 424264 341729 > 9132

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (34, 133, 860)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction