Information on Result #509289

There is no (47, 133, 1862)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8 364785 074187 381053 031684 142719 336491 441679 332965 402832 733246 988314 198043 433309 262824 617892 170265 824316 702373 186324 633695 105745 > 9133

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (47, 134, 1862)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction