Information on Result #509298
There is no (65, 133, 9124)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8 217032 623438 601952 305852 663089 990079 472178 920585 509033 941386 046155 481028 283038 404026 877443 558705 829285 230088 081458 661568 163009 > 9133
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (65, 134, 9124)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |