Information on Result #509328

There is no (52, 134, 2627)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 73 985521 802521 369773 673991 300096 623852 075206 825304 612768 040415 189714 647655 599094 063898 077886 223604 748099 427051 465485 884207 645657 > 9134

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (52, 135, 2627)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction