Information on Result #509365
There is no (51, 135, 2384)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 667 292555 710965 437851 040344 372596 182063 606799 689625 722994 204231 073111 224449 837275 997852 241810 630001 547459 041757 692741 119045 442305 > 9135
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (51, 136, 2384)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction |