Information on Result #509477
There is no (46, 138, 1612)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 484962 775363 166858 175919 642985 911030 725962 760389 835362 927769 582036 685439 268654 256165 572976 849379 446806 702193 449793 102181 278636 846017 > 9138
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (46, 139, 1612)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |