Information on Result #509486
There is no (64, 138, 6614)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 487065 162413 100250 667095 275096 458354 830588 747488 645745 591627 745456 754611 798263 415900 013173 412243 163679 123403 941004 611388 149391 662065 > 9138
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (64, 139, 6614)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction |