Information on Result #510029
There is no (4, 16, 322)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 18 605918 547833 877856 > 1616
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (4, 17, 322)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction |