Information on Result #510088
There is no (4, 26, 224)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 20 347479 276144 257124 471909 074461 > 1626
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (4, 27, 224)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |