Information on Result #510118

There is no (4, 30, 221)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 391241 215915 656824 299197 858296 344896 > 1630

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (4, 31, 221)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction