Information on Result #510165
There is no (9, 35, 653)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 404993 403709 036169 009693 183444 775395 405136 > 1635
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (9, 36, 653)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |