Information on Result #510262

There is no (8, 44, 433)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 98244 416849 794320 652374 828074 987033 617418 821195 504336 > 1644

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (8, 45, 433)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction