Information on Result #510264
There is no (12, 44, 920)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 95872 923399 771128 875447 032864 575644 871474 562781 128301 > 1644
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (12, 45, 920)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |