Information on Result #510355

There is no (13, 51, 892)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 25 806446 674508 686115 343438 684788 036690 123566 917584 409520 134271 > 1651

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (13, 52, 892)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction