Information on Result #510366

There is no (8, 52, 412)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 419 382680 596265 285738 015668 301576 509130 936843 702629 304868 989386 > 1652

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (8, 53, 412)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction