Information on Result #510467

There is no (32, 58, 89025)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 6902 354642 057909 716885 201098 230835 281847 547028 535115 534874 989674 957376 > 1658

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 59, 89025)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction