Information on Result #510564

There is no (30, 64, 16322)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 115813 665306 771574 006570 033260 822119 505856 154569 575726 620699 081987 394724 987036 > 1664

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (30, 65, 16322)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction