Information on Result #510581

There is no (29, 65, 11217)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 852841 416773 663836 224314 329302 580743 146998 765498 805876 325071 527354 261759 571616 > 1665

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (29, 66, 11217)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction