Information on Result #510600

There is no (32, 66, 22621)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 29 659477 320081 346518 210759 506813 789127 142071 807006 473265 458774 359781 366323 496956 > 1666

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 67, 22621)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction