Information on Result #510702

There is no (16, 72, 925)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 498 795137 838354 970759 116916 086672 787209 064827 457260 944383 980588 987582 691112 852838 171001 > 1672

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (16, 73, 925)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction