Information on Result #511022

There is no (21, 87, 1294)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 582 961443 322698 608127 806322 762494 069362 978945 797589 464361 969586 822262 009086 597527 646586 256438 365084 575656 > 1687

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (21, 88, 1294)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction