Information on Result #511045
There is no (20, 88, 1162)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 9323 716391 967362 466086 033197 284342 785892 429697 298252 278910 584912 232606 385677 925776 554544 208400 859631 485296 > 1688
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (20, 89, 1162)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |