Information on Result #511069
There is no (21, 89, 1262)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 147955 025668 126651 002723 331446 982089 902211 175736 348335 204569 376915 939407 422972 506083 891100 862565 268141 792546 > 1689
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (21, 90, 1262)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |