Information on Result #511140
There is no (20, 92, 1118)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 612 789167 535152 325215 895120 978781 109012 314861 926403 618400 839709 005808 228145 998323 304589 901224 309724 483108 039846 > 1692
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (20, 93, 1118)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction |