Information on Result #511297

There is no (32, 98, 3287)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 10133 112360 840170 664233 874454 925761 570955 527094 237559 657497 354105 765831 162837 392568 249115 291257 151171 063962 998927 670716 > 1698

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 99, 3287)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction